The Secret Life of Objects

This blog post is part 1 of 2.

I’ve encountered several hurdles while learning JavaScript. One of the biggest challenges has been chapter six of Eloquent JavaScript. I got through chapters 1-5 before starting the Flatiron bootcamp, but reaching this chapter was like hitting a wall.

When I first came across this chapter I hadn’t started learing Ruby and certainly didn’t have experience with classical OOP patterns in languages like Java. Even after learning Ruby I still couldn’t master this chapter.

Instead, I was exposed to material like JavaScript: The Good Parts. Author Douglas Crockford highlights a tension in JavaScript between its prototypical nature and some class-based syntax:

JavaScript itself is not confident in its prototypal nature, so it offers an object-making syntax that is reminiscent of the classical languages. Few classical programmers found prototypal inheritance to be acceptable, and classically inspired syntax obscures the language’s true prototypal nature. It is the worst of both worlds.

So, when I first started working on the exercises in chapter 6 I was resistant to practicing the class syntax.

Over the past few months I’ve begun learning the Java programming language. I’ve also gotten more practice with JavaScript prototypical inheritance. I think this has given me more appreciation for classical OOP, and a deeper understanding of JavaScript.

A Vector Type

Eloquent JavaScript explains the concept behind this challenge. To summarize, I needed to create a class Vec with a constructor, a few methods, and a getter.

Here is my solution:

class Vec {
  constructor(x, y) {
    this.x = x;
    this.y = y;

  coordinates() {
    console.log(`Coordinates ${this.x} and ${this.y}`);

  plus(vec) {
    return new Vec(this.x + vec.x, this.y + vec.y);

  minus(vec) {
    return new Vec(this.x - vec.x, this.y - vec.y);

  get length() {
    return Math.sqrt(Math.pow(this.x, 2) + Math.pow(this.y, 2));

VectorType: Lessons Learned

The hardest part about solving this problem was just accepting the classically-inspired syntax. Once I gave it a shot it was relatively easy to make the constructor and methods.


The second exercise in chapter six requires the creation of a “Group” class, modeled after JavaScript’s native Set object.

This is what I came up with:

class Group {
  constructor(arr) {
    this.entries = [];

  add(val) {
    if (!this.has(val)) {

  delete(val) {
    if (this.has(val)) {
      this.entries.splice(this.entries.indexOf(val), 1);

  has(val) {
    return this.entries.includes(val);

  static from(arr) {
    let newGroup = new Group();
    for (let i = 0; i < arr.length; i++) {
    return newGroup;

Groups: Lessons Learned

This problem was a bit trickier. Initially I tried to make each entry in the group a symbol. This approach wasn’t working, so I decided to simply create an entries property that defaults to a blank array. Once I made that switch the rest fell into place pretty quickly.

Thank you for reading this post. In the next post in this series I will discuss my solutions for the final two exercises in this chapter.